Configuration

There are two base abstractions used by JCL: Log (the basic logger) and LogFactory (which knows how to create Log instances). Specifying a particular Log implementation is very useful (whether that is one provided by commons-logging or a user-defined one). Specifying a LogFactory implementation other than the default is a subject for advanced users only, so will not be addressed here.

The default LogFactory implementation uses the following discovery process to determine what type of Log implementation it should use (the process terminates when the first positive match - in order - is found):

1. Look for a configuration attribute of this factory named org.apache.commons.logging.Log (for backwards compatibility to pre-1.0 versions of this API, an attribute org.apache.commons.logging.log is also consulted).

   Configuration attributes can be set explicitly by java code, but they are more commonly set by placing a file named commons-logging.properties in the classpath. When such a file exists, every entry in the properties file becomes an "attribute" of the LogFactory. When there is more than one such file in the classpath, releases of commons-logging prior to 1.1 simply use the first one found. From release 1.1, each file may define a priority key, and the file with the highest priority is used (no priority definition implies priority of zero). When multiple files have the same priority, the first one found is used.

   Defining this property in a commons-logging.properties file is the recommended way of explicitly selecting a Log implementation.

2. Look for a system property named org.apache.commons.logging.Log (for backwards compatibility to pre-1.0 versions of this API, a system property org.apache.commons.logging.log is also consulted).
3. If the Log4J logging system is available in the application class path, use the corresponding wrapper class (Log4JLogger).
4. If the application is executing on a JDK 1.4 system, use the corresponding wrapper class (Jdk14Logger).
5. Fall back to the default simple logging wrapper (SimpleLog).

Consult the JCL javadocs for details of the various Log implementations that ship with the component. (The discovery process is also covered in more detail there.)

Configuring The Underlying Logging System

The JCL SPI can be configured to use different logging toolkits (see above). JCL provides only a bridge for writing log messages. It does not (and will not) support any sort of configuration API for the underlying logging system.

Configuration of the behavior of the JCL ultimately depends upon the logging toolkit being used. Please consult the documentation for the chosen logging system.

Obtaining a Log Object

To use the JCL SPI from a Java class, include the following import statements:

import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;

import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;



Note that some components using JCL may either extend Log, or provide a component-specific LogFactory implementation. Review the component documentation for guidelines on how commons-logging should be used in such components.

For each class definition, declare and initialize a log attribute as follows:

public class CLASS
{
    private Log log = LogFactory.getLog(CLASS.class);
    ...
    ;
        

Note that for application code, declaring the log member as "static" is more efficient as one Log object is created per class, and is recommended. However this is not safe to do for a class which may be deployed via a "shared" classloader in a servlet or j2ee container or similar environment. If the class may end up invoked with different thread-context-classloader values set then the member must not be declared static. The use of "static" should therefore be avoided in code within any "library" type project.

Logging a Message

Messages are logged to a logger, such as log by invoking a method corresponding to priority. The org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface defines the following methods for use in writing log/trace messages to the log:

    log.fatal(Object message);
    log.fatal(Object message, Throwable t);
    log.error(Object message);
    log.error(Object message, Throwable t);
    log.warn(Object message);
    log.warn(Object message, Throwable t);
    log.info(Object message);
    log.info(Object message, Throwable t);
    log.debug(Object message);
    log.debug(Object message, Throwable t);
    log.trace(Object message);
    log.trace(Object message, Throwable t);
        

Semantics for these methods are such that it is expected that the severity, from highest to lowest, of messages is ordered as above.

In addition to the logging methods, the following are provided for code guards:

    log.isFatalEnabled();
    log.isErrorEnabled();
    log.isWarnEnabled();
    log.isInfoEnabled();
    log.isDebugEnabled();
    log.isTraceEnabled();
        

Serialization Issues

Prior to release 1.0.4, none of the standard Log implementations were Serializable. If you are using such a release and have a Serializable class with a member that is of type Log then it is necessary to declare that member to be transient and to ensure that the value is restored on deserialization. The recommended approach is to define a custom readObject method on the class which reinitializes that member.

In release 1.0.4, all standard Log implementations are Serializable. This means that class members of type Log do not need to be declared transient; on deserialization the Log object will "rebind" to the same category for the same logging library. Note that the same underlying logging library will be used on deserialization as was used in the original object, even if the application the object was deserialized into is using a different logging library. There is one exception; LogKitLogger (adapter for the Avalon LogKit library) is not Serializable for technical reasons.

Custom Log implementations not distributed with commons-logging may or may not be Serializable. If you wish your code to be compatible with any arbitrary log adapter then you should follow the advice given above for pre-1.0.4 releases.

commons-logging.jar

The commons-logging.jar file includes the JCL API, the default LogFactory implemenation and thin-wrapper Log implementations for Log4J, Avalon LogKit, the Avalon Framework's logging infrastructure, JDK 1.4, as well as an implementation of JDK 1.4 logging APIs (JSR-47) for pre-1.4 systems.

In most cases, including commons-logging.jar and your preferred logging implementation in the classpath should be all that is required to use JCL.

commons-logging-api.jar

The commons-logging-api.jar file includes the JCL API and the default LogFactory implementation as well as the built-in Log implementations SimpleLog and NoOpLog. However it does not include the wrapper Log implementations that require additional libraries such as Log4j, Avalon and Lumberjack.

This jar is intended for use by projects that recompile the commons-logging source using alternate java environments, and cannot compile against all of the optional libraries that the Apache release of commons-logging supports. Because of the reduced dependencies of this jarfile, such projects should be able to create an equivalent of this library with fewer difficulties.

This jar is also useful for build environments that automatically track dependencies, and thus have difficulty with the concept that the main commons-logging.jar has "optional" dependencies on various logging implementations that can safely go unsatisfied at runtime.

commons-logging-adapters.jar

The commons-logging-adapters.jar file includes only adapters to third-party logging implementations, and none of the core commons-logging framework. As such, it cannot be used alone; either commons-logging.jar or commons-logging-api.jar must also be present in the classpath.

This library will not often be used; it is only intended for situations where a container has deployed commons-logging-api.jar in a shared classpath but a webapp wants to bind logging to one of the external logging implementations that the api jar does not include. In this situation, deploying the commons-logging.jar file within the webapp can cause problems as this leads to duplicates of the core commons-logging classes (Log, LogFactory, etc) in the classpath which in turn can cause unpleasant ClassCastException exceptions to occur. Deploying only the adapters avoids this problem.

Code Guards

Code guards are typically used to guard code that only needs to execute in support of logging, that otherwise introduces undesirable runtime overhead in the general case (logging disabled). Examples are multiple parameters, or expressions (e.g. string + " more") for parameters. Use the guard methods of the form log.is<Priority>() to verify that logging should be performed, before incurring the overhead of the logging method call. Yes, the logging methods will perform the same check, but only after resolving parameters.

Message Priorities/Levels

It is important to ensure that log message are appropriate in content and severity. The following guidelines are suggested:

• fatal - Severe errors that cause premature termination. Expect these to be immediately visible on a status console. See also Internationalization.
• error - Other runtime errors or unexpected conditions. Expect these to be immediately visible on a status console. See also Internationalization.
• warn - Use of deprecated APIs, poor use of API, 'almost' errors, other runtime situations that are undesirable or unexpected, but not necessarily "wrong". Expect these to be immediately visible on a status console. See also Internationalization.
• info - Interesting runtime events (startup/shutdown). Expect these to be immediately visible on a console, so be conservative and keep to a minimum. See also Internationalization.
• debug - detailed information on the flow through the system. Expect these to be written to logs only.
• trace - more detailed information. Expect these to be written to logs only.

Default Message Priority/Level

By default the message priority should be no lower than info. That is, by default debug message should not be seen in the logs.

Logging Exceptions

The general rule in dealing with exceptions is to assume that the user (developer using a tooling/middleware API) isn't going to follow the rules. Since any problems that result are going to be assigned to you, it's in your best interest to be prepared with the proactive tools necessary to demonstrate that your component works correctly, or at worst that the problem can be analyzed from your logs. For this discussion, we must make a distinction between different types of exceptions based on what kind of boundaries they cross:

• External Boundaries - Expected Exceptions. This classification includes exceptions such as FileNotFoundException that cross API/SPI boundaries, and are exposed to the user of a component/toolkit. These are listed in the 'throws' clause of a method signature.
  
  Appropriate handling of these exceptions depends upon the type of code you are developing. API's for utility functions and tools should log these at the debug level, if they are caught at all by internal code.
  
  For higher level frameworks and middleware components, these exceptions should be caught immediatly prior to crossing the API/SPI interface back to user code-space, logged with full stack trace at info level, and rethrown. The assures that the log contains a record of the root cause for future analysis in the event that the exception is not caught and resolved as expected by the user's code.
  
  
• External Boundaries - Unexpected Exceptions. This classification includes exceptions such as NullPointerException that cross API/SPI boundaries, and are exposed to the user of a component/toolkit. These are runtime exceptions/error that are NOT listed in the 'throws' clause of a method signature.
  
  Appropriate handling of these exceptions depends upon the type of code you are developing. APIs for utility functions and tools should log these at the debug level, if they are caught at all.
  
  For higher level frameworks and middleware components, these exceptions should be caught immediately prior to crossing the API/SPI interface back to user code-space, logged with full stack trace at info level, and rethrown/wrapped as ComponentInternalError. This ensures that the log contains a record of the root cause for future analysis in the event that the exception is not caught and logged/reported as expected by the user's code.
• Internal Boundaries. Exceptions that occur internally and are resolved internally. These should be logged when caught as debug or info messages, at the programmer's discretion.
• Significant Internal Boundaries. This typically only applies to middleware components that span networks or runtime processes. Exceptions that cross over significant internal component boundaries such as networks should be logged when caught as info messages. Do not assume that such a (process/network) boundary will deliver exceptions to the 'other side'.

When Info Level Instead of Debug?

You want to have exception/problem information available for first-pass problem determination in a production level enterprise application without turning on debug as a default log level. There is simply too much information in debug to be appropriate for day-to-day operations.

More Control of Enterprise Exception Logging

If more control is desired for the level of detail of these 'enterprise' exceptions, then consider creating a special logger just for these exceptions:

   Log log = LogFactory.getLog("org.apache.component.enterprise");

This allows the 'enterprise' level information to be turned on/off explicitly by most logger implementations.

National Language Support And Internationalization

NLS internationalization involves looking up messages from a message file by a message key, and using that message for logging. There are various tools in Java, and provided by other components, for working with NLS messages.

NLS enabled components are particularly appreciated (that's an open-source-correct term for 'required by corporate end-users' :-) for tooling and middleware components.

NLS internationalization SHOULD be strongly considered for used for fatal, error, warn, and info messages. It is generally considered optional for debug and trace messages.

Perhaps more direct support for internationalizing log messages can be introduced in a future or alternate version of the Log interface.

Classloader and Memory Management

The LogFactory discovery process (see Configuration above) is a fairly expensive operation, so JCL certainly should not perform it each time user code invokes:

LogFactory.getLog()

Instead JCL caches the LogFactory implementation created as a result of the discovery process and uses the cached factory to return Log objects. Since in J2EE and similar multi-classloader environments, the result of the discovery process can vary depending on the thread context classloader (e.g. one webapp in a web container may be configured to use Log4j and another to use JDK 1.4 logging), JCL internally caches the LogFactory instances in a static hashtable, keyed by classloader.

While this approach is efficient, it can lead to memory leaks if container implementors are not careful to call

LogFactory.release()

whenever a classloader that has utilized JCL is undeployed. If release() is not called, a reference to the undeployed classloader (and thus to all the classes loaded by it) will be held in LogFactory's static hashtable.

Beginning with JCL 1.1, LogFactory caches factory implementations in a "WeakHashtable". This class is similar to java.util.WeakHashMap in that it holds a WeakReference to each key (but a strong reference to each value), thus allowing classloaders to be GC'd even if LogFactory.release() is never invoked.

Because WeakHashtable depends on JDK 1.3+ features, it is dynamically loaded depending on the JVM version; when commons-logging is run on java versions prior to 1.3 the code defaults to a standard Hashtable instead.

If a custom LogFactory implementation is used, however, then a WeakHashtable alone can be insufficent to allow garbage collection of a classloader without a call to release. If the abstract class LogFactory is loaded by a parent classloader and a concrete subclass implementation of LogFactory is loaded by a child classloader, the WeakHashtable's key is a weak reference to the TCCL (child classloader), but the value is a strong reference to the LogFactory instance, which in turn contains a strong reference to its class and thus loading classloader - the child classloader. This chain of strong references prevents the child loader from being garbage collected.

If use of a custom LogFactory subclass is desired, ensuring that the custom subclass is loaded by the same classloader as LogFactory will prevent problems. In normal deployments, the standard implementations of LogFactory found in package org.apache.commons.logging.impl will be loaded by the same classloader that loads LogFactory itself, so use of the standard LogFactory implementation should not pose problems. Alternatively, use the provided ServletContextCleaner to ensure this reference is explicitly released on webapp unload.

Contract

When creating new implementations for Log and LogFactory, it is important to understand the implied contract between the factory and the log implementations:

• Life cycle

  The JCL LogFactory implementation must assume responsibility for either connecting/disconnecting to a logging toolkit, or instantiating/initializing/destroying a logging toolkit.

• Exception handling

  The JCL Log interface doesn't specify any exceptions to be handled, the implementation must catch any exceptions.

• Multiple threads

  The JCL Log and LogFactory implementations must ensure that any synchronization required by the logging toolkit is met.

Creating a Log Implementation

The minimum requirement to integrate with another logger is to provide an implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface. In addition, an implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory interface can be provided to meet specific requirements for connecting to, or instantiating, a logger.

The default LogFactory provided by JCL can be configured to instantiate a specific implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.Log interface by setting the property of the same name (org.apache.commons.logging.Log). This property can be specified as a system property, or in the commons-logging.properties file, which must exist in the CLASSPATH.

Creating A LogFactory Implementation

If desired, the default implementation of the org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory interface can be overridden, allowing the JDK 1.3 Service Provider discovery process to locate and create a LogFactory specific to the needs of the application. Review the Javadoc for the LogFactoryImpl.java for details.